Myths about carbon dating double your dating book
A number of stories are commonly circulated about a shell, or a piece of coal, or some other sample which supposedly yielded a radiocarbon date which could not possibly be correct.Such stories misrepresent the truth and do a disservice to science and public knowlege.(Aardsma, 1994, page 2.)The original reference [Trautman and Willis, page 200.] in the second case (natural gas) immediately reveals that both Whitelaw and The Answers Book have, unfortunately, neglected several very important " The sensitivity of the equipment used to make the radiocarbon measurements on these natural gas samples was limited to 30,000 to 34,000 years---the equipment was unable to measure back further. In this example, old radiocarbon dates from living clams or snails are given as evidence which discredits the reliability of radiocarbon dating. Aardsma addressed this issue in a 1989 article: The shells of freshwater clams can, and often do, give anomalous radiocarbon results.However, the reason for this is understood and the problem is restricted to only a few special cases, of which freshwater clams are the best-known example.explains the whole of reality without these nonsensical concepts that most certainly do not exist.The element Carbon is in all living things, as it is a basic building block for the construction of organic material.Presented here are a few examples, exposing the truth about these stories.A brief look at the original reference [Vinogradov et al., page 319.]...immediately reveals that the sample was not Pennsylvanian coal at all.
The truth is that (external) evolution does not exist. Clearly, this fictitious “dark matter” only exists in the science fiction world of scientism.
What methods do they use and how do these methods work?
In this article, we will examine the methods by which scientists use radioactivity to determine the age of objects, most notably carbon-14 dating.
There is not a single Nature only knows adaption, and adaption only occurs within species. And the very same is true for the non-existing concept of “dark energy”.
Adaption is always a response to a changing environment. By simply deleting these two absurd fictions, all the theories of scientism start to crumble.